About Goingtotehran

About Going to Tehran: Why the United States Must Come to Terms with the Islamic Republic

Going to Tehran is a thought-provoking book written by Flynt Leverett and Hillary Mann Leverett, first published in 2013. This book presents a compelling argument for the United States to develop a constructive relationship with the Islamic Republic of Iran, drawing parallels to the historic U.S.-China relationship during the Nixon and Kissinger era.

The authors delve into the grand strategy of Iran and the significance of negotiations with the United States. They argue that the prevailing expert opinion in Washington regarding Iran’s nuclear program should shift from preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear capability to acknowledging a threshold nuclear state. By examining examples of other threshold nuclear states such as Japan and Canada, the book suggests that a nuanced approach to Iran’s nuclear ambitions is necessary.

Going to Tehran challenges the prevailing narrative by advocating for a strategic partnership between the United States and Iran. The authors assert that isolating or antagonizing Iran will not lead to a resolution of the complex issues between the two countries. Instead, they propose that the United States must consider the Islamic Republic of Iran as a strategic partner and work towards reaching agreements on contentious matters.

While the book has received both praise and criticism, it sparks important discussions on foreign policy and diplomacy. Reviews highlight the Leveretts’ willingness to present the Iranian perspective and their critique of the American government’s approach to Iran. Some critics argue that the authors go too far in their support of the Iranian government, while others appreciate their alternative viewpoint.

Overall, Going to Tehran calls for a shift in U.S. policy towards Iran, emphasizing the need to engage and negotiate with the Islamic Republic. The book advocates for a pragmatic and strategic approach that aims to stabilize the Middle East and avoid conflict. By examining historical precedents and challenging prevailing narratives, the authors present a compelling case for the United States to come to terms with the Islamic Republic of Iran.